If We Wish To Be Free!

Time To Hand Out Pink Slips

Gideon Henry — Thu, 06 Aug 2009 13:30:00 GMT

Time To Hand Out Pink Slips

Watch This: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZV84OBtGpSQ

My fellow Patriot Americans,

I have for years been saying that we need too and must wake up and take our country and government back before it is too late. Sadly as I write this that call seems so ever more urgent. Things have passed and are in the process of attempting to pass that could forever change the face of our country. Not a good change for the Americans who believe in the constitution and the freedom it is suppose to bring to us.

I am sure most of you have seen the advertisements on TV for The Girls Gone Wild Video. Someone should make a "The Representatives Gone Wild" video. Most of them are doing anything but representing us, their bosses. Yes they do work for us, not that you could tell by the way they ignore our will and the way they talk about us when we dare stand up and express our will.

One of the first things we should do is join together and make sure something is put in effect to protect the Internet and access to it by Americans at a reasonable cost. Aside from the 2nd Amendment and our Right To Bear Arms, nothing may be more important in our fight and struggle to keep our freedom and our country as our founders intended. I think most would agree that the right to access to the Internet is something we should demand and expect.

I am sure that the people in DC who are trying to ram bills down our throats that no one has read including the people voting for them wishes right now that Al Gore hadn't of invented the Internet.

That aside this isn't about Democrats, this isn't about Republicans, it isn't about parties. It is about principal and what this country was founded on. both parties are more concerned about being or staying in power then they are about doing the right thing for the country. We must put our ego aside and realize that there is very little difference in the two main political parties today. The biggest difference is the way they spell their name.

It is time for a 3rd Main Party and maybe even a 4th. There is a reason that it is so difficult for another party to form and get traction. The two main parties have passed laws to make it so. Why? To make it easier for them to stay in power. There are numerous Third Parties in this country but we Americans really need a 3rd and maybe 4th party that can and will compete with the two parties in power.

I don't have the means, knowledge or know how to do something like this. But together we can and will have those means.

Remember in the fall of 2008 when the earth was going to stop spinning and the sun was going to stop shinning if they didn't pass the first bailout RIGHT NOW? Remember how it didn't pass for a few days and during those days the earth was still turning and the sun was still shinning? That was a mistake in passing and so is this other stuff that HAS to be passed right now. It is SO urgent there is no time to even read the bill or give the American people time to read the bill.

One of the saddest things about this is that the burden these white haired men and women (yes they dye their hair) have passed on to our Children and Grand Children, a lot of these people will be dead and buried BEFORE our Children are old enough to even vote. Yet these Children are still saddled with this debt given to them by people who won't be around to see them struggle with it.

It IS about our Children and our Grand Children and our Great Grand Children. We must stand up for them. We must unite for them, and we must protect their freedom that so many in DC is trying to take away from them.

We stand up to them and ask them questions and they (the elite) call us an angry mob. The people in DC don't care what we think or what we want. If they did then they would listen to us and stop this insanity they are doing in DC. They have forgotten and the ones who haven't don't care who they are working for. If we had an employee that wouldn't listen to how we wanted them to do their job that we gave them, we would fire them

It is time we start doing some firing while we are still able to do so. In time if we wait too long, we won't be able to fire anyone, or say no to anything they may deem would be best for us.

Do Democrats Really Want To Share Credit With Republicans On Good Ideas?

Gideon Henry — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:54:00 GMT

Do Democrats Really Want To Share Credit With Republicans On Good Ideas?

What is your honest answer to this question? The Democrats don't need any help from Republicans in the House to get anything passed. The Democrats in the Senate don't need any help from the Republicans to get a big majority of the votes.

The facts are that the Democrats have all the votes they need to pass ANY bill they want to pass. After it is passed they have a Democrat President to sign that bill.

WHY then are Democrats working so hard to attempt to get Republicans on board? They want their ideas. Hardly? Did Ms. Pelosi give the Republicans any chance to put their ideas into the bill? You know the answer to that.

So if this Pork Package is such a good bill and will work so good, then why worry about getting Republicans on board? Is it because the Democrats want to make sure the Republicans also get credit for this great bill? You know the answer to that too.

The Democrats are afraid and aren't confident that this Pork Package will work. They want Republicans on board so if it doesn't work they will be able to say it wasn't only them.

The facts are this. If a few Republicans come on board and this Pork Package is a success the Republicans won't get credit for it. If it isn't a success then they will get the blame for it. So if a bad idea won't get you credit if it turns out good, then why put yourself up to take part of the blame?

It is time for Conservative Republicans to take a stand and it is time for Pretend Republicans like Arlan Specter and Ms. Collins to change parties or take a hike because they are Republicans in name ONLY.

Use a little common sense. The Democrats DON'T need Republicans to get bills passed. Then WHY if their ideas and bill is so good are they trying so hard to get Republicans on board? It is for cover.

How smart are the Real Conservative Republicans? I guess we will find out.

Do Republicans Really Want To Be In Power?

Gideon Henry — Sat, 07 Feb 2009 01:18:00 GMT

Do Republicans Really Want To Be In Power?

What kind of question is this you may ask? The problem was that they wanted to stay in power so bad that they stopped governing the way they were elected to govern. They weren't thrown out of office because they governed with conservative values BUT because they didn't govern with those values.

It appeared that the republicans were more concerned about getting along and going along with democrats then to govern with the values that got them elected in the first place. Now they want to change things yet the leadership is the same. When the conservative republicans truly want to be back in power, then they will change their leadership.

Maybe then we can believe them when they say they learned their lesson and will govern with the conservative values they had campaigned on. If conservative republicans want to regain power then they need to be conservative and not compromise those values to gain favor with the press or democrats. Those groups don't want them in power anyway.

At least the House Republicans stood up for conservative values and the people when everyone of them voted against the Pork Package Obama and Pelosi is trying to force down everyone's throats.

Now the Senate is trying to come to an agreement on the Pork Package. Two so called Republicans have come on board. Ms. Collins and Mr. Specter. I believe Mr. Specter will be up for re-election soon. The last time he had a tough battle to get his parties nomination. Getting on board with this Pock Package may very well cost him his parties nomination. I for one will not forget this.

Remember last fall when the TARP bill HAD to be passed. When it finally passed look what has happened. NOW this one really has to pass.

If Republicans really want to be in power again then they need to stand together and oppose this pork package. This won't work and will only makes things worse. Why put your name on it?

Congratulations President-Elect Obama

Gideon Henry — Wed, 05 Nov 2008 13:53:00 GMT

A Chance To Be A Great President

Without a doubt history was made last night in our great country. Great things can come from that night if only one person decides he WILL BE the President for all of us. The power is in President-Elect Obama's hands.

If he makes the decision to be everyone's President, there are some people that he will have to go against. The very same people that helped get him elected, but to truly be America's President he will have to do that. With his margin of victory he has the power to do that if only he will take it.

Nancy Pelosi doesn't represent main street America. She represents San Francisco. San Francisco isn't main street America. Harry Reid doesn't represent main street America. Neither does Chris Dodd, Barney Frank or Charlie Rangle.

President-Elect Obama can not represent main street America or be a great President if he listens too and or follows their advice and lead. Right now he has the power and he doesn't HAVE too. It he does it is because he WANTS too.

People have asked for a change. Pelosi, Reid, Dodd, Frank, and Rangle aren't change and aren't new. They will attempt to drag him as far left as possible. If he allows that, he can't and won't be President of all of the people.

The vicious way politics have become with attempting to destroy the opposition no matter what has gotten completely out of hand. President-Elect Obama truly has the chance and the power to change that. Not by attempting to destroy common citizens like Joe The Plumber, but by saying enough is enough. By him demanding people in his party STOP it. He has that power right now. It will mean putting a leash on Pelosi and Reid and the like, but right now he has the power to do that.

President-Elect Obama has the chance to be a Great President, but only if he TRULY puts party politics aside and think and do what is TRULY best for the country and her people. He has the power and we should give him the chance to prove himself.

As we give him that chance it is not too turn a blind eye to what he is doing or to whose advice he is taking. Let us hope he does make a Great President, but let us not fear to speak out when he isn't preforming for Main Street America.

Good Luck President-Elect Obama, may your actions be as great as your words. Don't forget you are representing the ones who didn't vote for you also.

What Barack Obama Will Do To You!

Gideon Henry — Mon, 03 Nov 2008 16:11:00 GMT

The Truth Has Been Shown

It is less then 24 hours before the election of 2008 will take place. If you love this country and if you love the freedom you have in this country, you may want to read this.

Everyone is caught up in this election and it's importance. So many have picked sides and there is no changing their minds. It is time for change and nothing less is acceptable.

Let us just for a while try to use a little common sense and actually think for a few minutes on our own, without being influenced by the media and such that are in the tank for a candidate.

First, Change just for the sake of change is not always the best thing to happen. Remember this. Now remember Joe The Plumber.

Barack Obama always talks the words of helping the middle class and lower then middle class people. Obama says the words about helping these people each and every day, many times a day. Just Words?

Here is where the common sense comes in. Obama speaks these words, but remember the saying "actions speak louder then words"? What actions did Obama take with Joe The Plumber?

Barack Obama came to Joe The Plumber's neighborhood and his house as he was canvassing the neighborhood. All Joe The Plumber did was ask Obama a question and followed up on Obama's answer.

This issue that came around because of Joe The Plumber's question had nothing to do with Joe The Plumber and everything to do with Barack Obama's answer.

Yet Barack Obama, Joe Biden and the people that speak for them attempted to make it about Joe The Plumber. They made fun of him and tried to demean him. Supporters of Obama have even run back ground checks on Joe The Plumber. And Barack Obama ALLOWED it.

It wouldn't matter if Joe The Plumber was an ax murderer, that isn't the issue. Yet Obama and his crew are and have tried to make that the issue. Trying to discredit Joe The Plumber. Yet all Joe did was ask a question in his neighborhood that Obama was visiting. That is all he did. The ISSUE was the ANSWER, or at least should have been. Yet Obama and his supporters wanted to make Joe The Plumber the issue. WHY?

So using common sense if Barack Obama will go after and ALLOW his people to go after a common middle class person that ONLY asked a question, then what will he do TO you?

The FACTS ARE Obama and his machine went after a TRUE middle class citizen that ONLY asked a question. Is this the SAME Obama that will stand and fight for the middle class? Is this the SAME Obama that will help the middle class. Would you want the help he tried to give Joe The Plumber? A true member of the middle class that has dreams of doing better.

Obama is a socialist and maybe worse. Don't get so caught up in the words calling for change that you don't hear what he is really saying and not saying. Use some common sense then just think for a minute what Obama and his machine did to a simple middle class person that only asked a question from his neighborhood that Obama was visiting. Obama came to him, and after Obama's true thoughts came out in his answer, Obama and his machine attempted to destroy the middle class American citizen that only asked a question.

That is a fact and that IS an action, not just words. Obama proved and showed what he would do to anyone that gets in his way.

All I can say is BEWARE and THINK before it is too late.

Remember Partial Birth and Remember Birth Certificate.

And remember what Patrick Henry said; "I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging the future but by the past."

Also by Patrick Henry; "It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope"

"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men,
undergo the fatigues of supporting it."

-- Thomas Paine (The Crisis, no. 4, 11 September 1777)

"Our hope will become the light that will shine the way to pave the road for our children. The road of our children has to be a road of freedom." Gideon Henry

Socialist America

Gideon Henry — Mon, 13 Oct 2008 15:52:00 GMT

Socialist America - How Close Are We??

Socialist Democrats can now welcome the Socialist Republican to their ranks.

In 2006 I told people if the Republicans give you headaches by not governing under the principals that they ran for office, then vote Democrat. They might not govern the may you would like but at least you wouldn't be surprised.

Is it a coincidence that the economy had tanked in the last 20 months or so? I don't believe in coincidences. There is always a reason.

I have warned people over and over again that there is more then what is obvious to even the blindest of us. (Is that a word?) I have warned that we need to act while we still are able to make our voices heard. I have warned that in time if we do nothing or ignore being ignored that it time we wouldn't be able to do anything. That time may be closer then any of us think.

Always remember that there is MORE to it then what you can see. Always remember people in power uses fear to keep power and to obtain more power. Always remember the people in power want us at each others throats so we aren't paying attention to them.

Always remember that a good puppet master you will never see.

We made our desires known to congress with this bail out. After the 777 dow drop all they talked about was the large loss. No mention was made of the big gain the next day. Only the big loss. One representative stated that the opposition to the bail out went from 30 to 1 against to 10 to 1 against. Acting like that was a sign he should support the bail out. The fact is it was STILL 10 to 1 against the bail out.

The Senate and the House of Representatives decided they knew best what the American people needed. One made the statement they had to do what was best for us even if we didn't want or like it.

Now since Both houses of congress has refused to listen to our desires and passed this bill, even though all they could say was: "we hope it will work", "we don't know if it will work", "maybe it will work", "it may stop the bleeding, but we will have to do more", "it could work", "it might work", "if we do nothing it will only get worse", "action has too be taken now", blah, blah, blah.

THINGS HAVE GOTTEN WORSE!!!!

They talked about the over 1,000,000,000,000 loss with the 777 dow drop but said nothing about the big rebound the next day. But now it is over 2,000,000,000,000 losses and counting. Now where are our so called Representatives. If over $1,000,000,000,000 in losses was such a crisis that had to be taken care of then why isn't over $2,000,000,000,000 in losses even a bigger crisis?

Now the government is buying stock in banks? When will they take over McDonald's other businesses the government wants to have their finger in?

Socialism is not good. You have Socialist Democratic Leaders of Congress and now it appears you have Socialist Republican Leaders of Congress. Pelosi and Reid DOESN'T speak for the majority of Americans. For God's Sake she represents San Francisco and he is from a state that ranks 35th in population and is famous for gambling and hookers. Don't get offended Nevada that is the truth. Vegas is a great place to visit but ask 100, or 1,000 or 1,000,000,000,000 what is Nevada known for and see how many answers you get of Legal Gambling or Vegas and Prostitution.

These are the two people leading the congress? Give me a break. Democrats need to take their party back and put people in power with common sense. But no you have the leaders mentions plus other so called Representatives like Give me a mortgage, C Dodd and nothing is wrong with fannie or freddy, B Frank.

Remember a time when both parties seemed to be working for the good of the country instead of the good of their own personal pocketbooks? The leaders need to go. We need fresh blood on both sides. People who WANT to represent the people not the money.

If you have read me you know I don't care for Juan McCain. But I care less for a Pelosi - Reid led congress with a president called Obama. If you are thinking what is happening right now seems or is socialist just wait.

What we as Americans that love our freedom and rights need to do is to concentrate on the House of Representatives and Senate. We need to put people in that at least says they will stop some of this. If this doesn't happen how can you as Americans have any hope of stopping the Socialist Express that is coming around the bend??

If we don't stop barking at each other and realize our attention should be focused on the Socialists (both parties) raiding our tax dollars then many that have never prayed to God may find themselves doing so when our rights and freedoms continue to disappear.

Wake up America, Wake up Patriots, Wake up Free People, the Socialists are coming, the Socialists are coming. Make lite of it but think, get your ego out of the way and think. If we are going to remain free we must work together. If we don't we will suffer together.

Sometimes maybe we should go back and read what some of our founding fathers said. We can STILL listen and learn from them.

"A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader." -- Samuel Adams (letter to James Warren, 12 February 1779)

You Have Seen History

Gideon Henry — Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:53:00 GMT

If You Watched Sarah Palin's Speech You Have Seen History

Sarah Palin may not be the first woman vice president for the United States. But if you watched her speech last night at the Republican Convention, you did watch the First Woman President of the United States give a speech. She just doesn't have the title yet.

Who would have thought that John McCain could have picked someone that could actually get Republicans excited about the election? McCain is not going to excite people and the so called base has a lot of problems with him. Whether is was genius on his part, or pure luck, John McCain has changed the face of politics by introducing the world to Sarah Palin.

Our country, the Patriot Americans need to unite and work together to take the power of the country back from the elite power brokers that call DC home. With someone like Sarah Palin, the Patriots of this country have hope. And with that hope for them comes hope for America.

A REAL person is running for a high office. Let us embrace that and support her and help her remain REAL. America is broke (in more ways then one) and it is not because of REAL PEOPLE. Let's encourage one Real Person who can and will speak for us.

This COULD be the start of Real People Taking Back Control Of The Government. We NEED to do it BEFORE it is too late. If we wait long enough, it will be too late.

God Bless America and God Bless Sarah Palin and her family.

I have been quite just watching and listening and observing. It is time for all of us to start speaking.

Is Juan McCain The Anti-Christ?

Gideon Henry — Tue, 05 Aug 2008 20:13:00 GMT

I am posting this article again because he has brought out so many emotions. I have posted some and others were not put through. PLEASE if you read this again or for the first time do not let a word or two color what you THINK I am trying to say.

Look at the categories and what is used. "What Is Real?" Look at the name Juan for John. Then think back about what John McCain has said and done. If you think about those things and keep your emotions in check you may see and understand some of the points I was attempting to make in this writing. Anyone is welcome to make any comments about things they either agree with or disagree with, but please we can do it without the @#$^#$#$%. If that is the only way you can communicate then you don't have anything worth listening too. And please let's not tear others down if a typo is made or a mistake is made in spelling. It takes courage for people to step out and speak. A lot won't just for reasons of the fear of being made fun of.

In the end we are going to need each other to save our freedoms. Don't think people aren't trying to take them away from us. Even though we all don't speak with the same voice, at least let us speak.

Is Juan McCain The Anti-Christ?

How dare I ask such a question? Is John McCain a TRUE war hero? How dare I ask that question also?

I have liked Ann Coulter because she will make statements that will make you think. After her radio spot with Sean Hannity last Friday I may love her. Mr. Hannity couldn't stand it that she was saying she would campaign for Hillary if McCain was running against her. Mr. Hannity couldn't get past her statement of support to hear her valid reasons for such a move.

Have you noticed or seen John McCain's new ads? According to him he is the TRUE Conservative. Since he wants to use the word True, maybe we should ask if he is a True War Hero. How dare I even consider to ask such a question? Go back and read this, then you decide if it is a fair question. http://blog.commonsensepatriot.com/2008/01/27/what-is-a-war-hero.aspx

Is John McCain the Anti Christ? How can I ask such a question? Part is with tongue in cheek but not entirely. He is the Anti-Reagan. He claims to be a TRUE conservative and attempts to present himself in the mold of Reagan.

So does anything that is said about the Anti-Christ in the bible ring in tune with the Anti-Reagan called John (Juan) McCain? Have fun and read and think:

1 John 2

18 Children, it is the last hour; and just as you heard that antichrist is coming, even now many Antichrists have arisen; from this we know that it is the last hour.

19 They went out from us, but they were not really of us; for if they had been of us, they would have remained with us; but they went out, in order that it might be shown that they all are not of us. (Does this remind you of anything or anyone (s)???????

Daniel 7
20 and the meaning of the ten horns that were on its head, and the other horn which came up, and before which three of them fell, namely, that horn which had eyes and a mouth uttering great boasts, and which was larger in appearance than its associates.

21 "I kept looking, and that horn was waging war with the saints and overpowering them

Daniel 8

24 "And his power will be mighty, but not by his own power, And he will destroy to an extraordinary degree And prosper and perform his will; He will destroy mighty men and the holy people.

25 "And through his shrewdness He will cause deceit to succeed by his influence; And he will magnify himself in his heart, And he will destroy many while they are at ease.

Daniel 11

21 "And in his place a despicable person will arise, on whom the honor of kingship has not been conferred, but he will come in a time of tranquility and seize the kingdom by intrigue.

22 "And the overflowing forces will be flooded away before him and shattered, and also the prince of the covenant.

23 "And after an alliance is made with him he will practice deception, and he will go up and gain power with a small force of people.

2 Corinthians 11

3 But I am afraid, lest as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, your minds should be led astray from the simplicity and purity of devotion to Christ.

4 For if one comes and preaches another Jesus whom we have not preached, or you receive a different spirit which you have not received, or a different gospel which you have not accepted, you bear this beautifully.

13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. (Reagan)

14 And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.

15 Therefore it is not surprising if his servants also disguise themselves as servants of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their deeds.

2 Thessalonians 2:3-12

3 Let no one in any way deceive you, for [the day of the Lord] will not come unless the apostasy comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction,

4 who opposes and exalts himself above every so-called god or object of worship, so that he takes his seat in the temple of God, displaying himself as being God.

5 Do you not remember that while I was still with you, I was telling you these things?

6 And you know what restrains him now, so that in his time he may be revealed.

7 For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work; only he who now restrains will do so until he is taken out of the way.

1 John 4

4:1 Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world.

Revelation 13

1 And he stood on the sand of the seashore. And I saw a beast coming up out of the sea, having ten horns and seven heads, and on his horns were ten diadems, and on his heads were blasphemous names.

2 And the beast which I saw was like a leopard, and his feet were like those of a bear, and his mouth like the mouth of a lion. And the dragon gave him his power and his throne and great authority.

3 And I saw one of his heads as if it had been slain, and his fatal wound was healed. And the whole earth was amazed and followed after the beast; (can we say New Hampshire healed the wound of Iowa?)

4 and they worshiped the dragon, because he gave his authority to the beast; and they worshiped the beast, saying, "Who is like the beast, and who is able to wage war with him?"

5 And there was given to him a mouth speaking arrogant words and blasphemies; and authority to act for forty-two months was given to him.

If I offended anyone with this I guess I could say I am sorry, but I won't. I too am offended. I am offended that John (Juan) McCain is attempting to Steal the conservative mantel.

Remember when he told Mitt Romney he could spend all of his fortune but it wouldn't make what he was saying the truth?

The same goes for John McCain. He can run ads and more ads. He can say and say again that he is the True Conservative, the real conservative, THAT still doesn't make it TRUE. Because it isn't true. It is a lie. John McCain is closer to liberal then he is to conservative, THAT is the TRUTH!!

Listen conservatives. The ones that like McCain (democrats, moderates, independents) will NOT vote for McCain in the general election. They will vote for Obama or Clinton. McCain will NOT win the general election. So at least stay true to your principals and put someone in who is closer to your way of thinking. At least they MIGHT win, with McCain you are embracing a TRUE LOSER in the General Election.

Commenting on a comment

Gideon Henry — Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:54:00 GMT

We have a number of people who attempt to comment on comments made on this blog. If you want your comment to be put up there are some rules you HAVE to follow.

1st. Have guts enough to put you name down and an email address. If you feel so strong about something then have guts enough to put your name on it. If not don't bother.

2nd. Please read what you are responding too. Know who got your panties all twisted up in a knot before your respond. Know that comments are just that and they aren't from the writer of this blog. Just because I put a comment through doesn't mean I agree with it. But I do believe in our free speech.

3rd. If you can't make a sensible comment without profanity then go educate yourself before you attempt to comment on a comment.

4th. You don't have to agree with me to make comments about something I have said. But make sure it is a comment I made if you want to rant and rave to me. If you want to rant on something someone else said then direct your comments to them.

5th. If you follow these rules your comments will be posted. Be Brave We Are All In This Together!

The Crisis of the Crisis

Gideon Henry — Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:36:00 GMT

The Crisis of the Crisis

How Good Is Your Memory?

Doesn't it seem like there is always SOME type of Crisis that we need to deal with. Or should I say that the government will have to deal with. Some of the ways government remains and gains power is by presenting fear to the general population. Fear about something that ONLY the government will be able to handle in the proper way. This will be the first in a series of articles about Crisis.

THE TRUTH THAT WILL SET YOU FREE!
It IS ALL about the power. There is no such thing as coincidence. Very FEW will step in front of another to stop a bullet.
Those who drink from the grapes of power have trouble saying NO to one more glass of wine. You have freedom as long as you do what the government says you should do. Is that the freedom our founding fathers envisioned?
Government gains more power and is questioned less when fear and safety is brought into the picture. Once people have tasted power, they don't want to give up that taste. After tasting the grapes of power for too long, people start believing that it is THEIR right to continue to taste that wine. Not their honor, their right. When they get to that mindset, their actions are more about keeping themselves in power then doing what is best and right for the people.

The Crisis of the War on Terror!
I will deal with many crisis but the first one, let it be the so called War On Terror! What has that war brought to this country? I guess I could say thank goodness we invaded Iraq, can you image how high gas prices would have been by now if we had stayed in our own country?

What the war on terror has brought us. We have to wear socks now that are clean and no holes if we are going to fly. We don't actually have to, but it could be embarrassing. Depending on the mood of the people in charge we may or may not be able to take shampoo, toothpaste, nail cllppers etc. with us on our flight.

The War on Terror have gotten a great word ,PATRIOT, hijacked by congress in passing laws that take our rights away. By calling it the Patriot Act they attempt to make it so that anyone that would oppose it would BE, UNPATRIOTIC. A good way to keep people in check and quite.

As soon as this act or parts of it are due to expire, then we hear how much MORE in danger we will be if it isn't renewed. But in truth what is in more danger is OUR rights as AMERICANS. The very people who would and who have killed our people. The very people who would take our freedoms away from us have had to do nothing more then fly the planes into the buildings. Our elected representatives have done the rest as far as taking some of our rights and freedoms away from us.

If Bin Laden was so important in this War of Terror, then why did we not continue with him until we found him? Could it be because he would be more valuable to the people in power alive and free then dead or captured? Why go into Iraq before the job with Bin Laden was finished? Wouldn't there have been time after that job was finished to then go after Iraq?

Do you remember why we went into Iraq? Weapons of Mass Destruction. WMD's. Now after none were found I REMEMBER the people in power saying there were more reasons then JUST WMD's for going into Iraq. The trouble with that is that I ALSO REMEMBER Colin Powell going to the United Nations outlining the reason for going into Iraq. WMD's was the reason. Once they didn't find WMD's they changed their story or reasons. The ONLY problem with that is that I REMEMBER Powell's talk at the United Nations. Some of this stuff would be so much easier to believe if my memory wasn't so good.

So once no WMD's were found and Saddam was pulled out of the Rat Hole I had a simple solution to the problem. Put him back in power. Don't you think he would have played ball with us? Let HIM get his country back into control and remember we dug you out of a rat hole, we can do it again. But no that would have been too simple. Instead it was very important to make sure he was dead. What was such the rush? As far as that goes what was such the rush of killing the Oklahoma City Bomber? Both people still had much information, so why such the rush to close the lips of that information? Remember there are no coincidences.

The war on terror has been a very high cost of blood and treasure. The dems like to use that wording a lot. But billions and billions of dollars have been sent to a country we invaded. Thousands of our young people have lost their life's, and many more thousands have lost body parts. Remember Viet Nam? I do and back then you had old men and some not so old playing with the lives of young American boys sending them to fight a war that was NEVER declared. Have we actually declared war on Iraq???

NOW the difference is that we have old men and some not so old, and old women and some not so old, playing with the lives of our young American boys and girls in a war (was it ever declared?). So I guess the BIG question I HAVE to ask about the War On Terror is this. If the War on Terror is SO important, and if the main reason is too keep our country and people safe, then WHY after 6 1/2 years since 911 are our borders STILL SO OPEN!!!!!!

IF IT IS about keeping our people safe and our country safe, wouldn't one of the first things you do is make SURE it is difficult for people to enter our country without us knowing about it??? It just makes common sense to me that closing our borders would be one of the FIRST things we should do. I would think that most of our young people would rather be protecting our borders from invasion then being the invaders. If the terrorists can't get here, then won't it be harder for them to hurt us? If our young people are going to have to serve in a desert wouldn't most rather be closer to home? At least this way maybe they could get home more to see their families and be serving in a safer place.

The problem is NOT our young people serving. They will protect us, they have already given so much. The problem is not with them. The problem is with the people in power on BOTH sides , that are playing with their lives. Making them serve tour after tour of duty.

The Crisis Of The War On Terror!
If it is such a big deal then WHY aren't our borders closed? WHY? You can't say we haven't had enough time to close them. We have had over six years. If our safety and the safety of our country is so important to take away people's rights and freedoms (such as the Patriot Act), then WHY isn't it important enough to seal our borders???

How can it be a crisis, how can it be a war on terror, when one of the most important things to do to assure our safety ISN'T done? Is it as much a War On Terror or is it more a War On The Rights Of Americans?

America's Biggest Homegrown Terror Cell

Gideon Henry — Wed, 27 Feb 2008 06:46:00 GMT

America's Biggest Homegrown Terror Cell

People in Washington are always talking about the war on terror. Always talking about how important this fight is. Yet these same people are so lax in there true opinion about securing our borders. Why, once 911 happened, wasn't the sealing of our borders one of the first things we did?

Until people get serious about the sealing of the borders to protect our country and our people, I can't take their talk too seriously. There is always the talk about this terrorist group or that terrorist or group. Yet the biggest terrorist group in America, the one group that strikes fear in the heart of almost every American is a homegrown group or Cell as so many that talk about protecting us (but not doing the first step of closing the borders) like to call them, that was actually created by the United States Government.

What can I be talking about? "Terror" to frighten, a state of intense fear, a frightening aspect, one that inspires fear, a cause of anxiety. "Terrorism" the systematic use of terror esp as a means of coercion. "Terrorize" to fill with terror or anxiety, to coerce by threat.

Read those definitions, do they remind you of anything? How about April 15th? How about anytime a person gets a letter from the IRS? Are not the American people terrorized by the thought of having to deal with the IRS? Then you hear stories like the one coming out of Illinois.

"The Internal Revenue Service recently warned a seven-year-old boy from the northwestern Chicago suburb of Carpentersville that he owed back taxes on $60,000."

Now you know what the IRS does when they warn. People are so afraid of them because the power they have when they say you owe something. They strike FEAR in the hearts of Americans. One reason citizens need to get behind the Fair Tax, www.fairtax.org .

I remember the time when you went and got a Social Security Number when you reached the age where you could start working. NOW they are gotten at birth, WHY? Why make the parents apply for a SSN for a child 16 years before they would start working? This itself is another issue.

The facts are this seven year old CHILD may face problems in life with his credit rating. You know how hard it is to get your rating fixed because of identity theft if that has ever happened to you. If this child didn't have to get a SSN until he was old enough to work, then at this time he wouldn't be a victim.

"Officers said Friday the second-grader's identity has been in use by someone else since 2001 -- not long after his birth.

Detectives accused 29-year-old Cirilo Centeno of Streamwood of using the boy's personal information to obtain a truck, three separate jobs, gas and electrical service for his home, a credit card, unemployment benefits and more than $60,000 in pay and services."

WHAT IS WRONG WITH THIS PICTURE????
A seven year old has three separate jobs, gas and electrical service for his home, a credit card,unemployment benefits, more then $60,000.00 in pay and services???????? Why wasn't this caught instead of getting a warning letter from the IRS? Why didn't a human being with a little common sense look at this and say "Something is wrong here, I need to find out what is going on." NOT send a warning letter.

Do you remember hearing stories of people calling IRS asking the SAME questions about Tax Codes and getting different answers from different people from the same question? It happens all the time. In the next couple of months it will be happening. How can an agency that is given so much power, not being held accountable for knowing the answers? If it is because the answers are to complicated then doesn't that say something for our tax code?

Does it get harder every year to do my taxes because I am getting less smart every year, or is it because they make them more complicated? Why do they make them harder to understand? To keep the control and power. If people don't understand, they will be less likely to create waves.

Some will say, it can't be changed. Why can't it. OUR representatives are the ones that give the IRS life. They are the same ones that can take it away. Like the war so many will say we need to get out, yet these same people who have the power to do something about it won't. Yes I am talking about the representatives. They talk about getting out, yet they are the ones that hold the purse strings and they keep on opening the purse. Check out the Fair Tax, the tax code CAN be changed.

It reminds me of the Sarah Conner Chronicles. Have you seen it or the movies? Man creates robots then finally robots take over. Well man created IRS and listening to some people talk we can't do much about the tax code. WHY NOT??? We can and the representatives that say we can't should be sent home to live under the laws they have passed. They should be replaced with people who WILL represent the people.

"Our hope will become the light that will shine the way to pave the road for our children. The road of our children has to be a road of freedom."

"It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope"
GIDEON HENRY
http://blog.commonsensepatriot.com/
http://www.commonsensepatriot.com/
http://www.patriotamericanparty.com

Three Reasons Conservatives Are Excited About Bush 41's Endorsement Of McCain

Gideon Henry — Tue, 19 Feb 2008 05:16:00 GMT

Three Reasons Conservatives Are Excited About Bush 41's Endorsement Of McCain

Read My Lips!

It was interesting listening to the reporting today of George H.W. Bush endorsing John McCain. Many talking about how this should help win over the conservative members of the party that have been objecting to McCain. Of course the many making such statements would have liberal leanings if the truth was known. Since he was Vice-President under President Reagan for eight years, then the endorsement would surely win them over.

With that reasoning the conservatives must really be dumb. Or is it the liberal pundits? Let's examine why like John McCain, George H.W. Bush also had problems with the conservative members of the republican party.

So why would the conservative members of the Republican Party be so excited about Bush 41 endorsing McCain? Let us visit three reasons.

"Voodoo Economics"    Some of us haven't forgotten that BEFORE Ronald Reagan gave George Bush life again and picked him to be the Vice President that they had a very combative battle for the Republican nomination.

"New World Order" As much as some, maybe many would like for you to think
that there is nothing to the talk of a New World Order. There is something to it. Do some research, if not for yourself, if not for your country, then for the children. If you don't believe in the New World Order, then don't be lazy, do some research. It is real and it is out there for you to find.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CWBTL33MpA
also this one
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pVmL2RyYe4&feature=related

Listen to this, the words that are said. Do some research and the words will jump out at you.

"Read My Lips" Who can forget that? " Read My Lips, No New Taxes." Until he teamed with the democrats. Wow, could that also be something that could happen with John McCain??   Watch the video and hear what he said, then compare it to what he did. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP9_kkzfN-w
also listen to this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5DZBFbMdjI&feature=RecentlyWatched&page=1&t=t&f=b

McCain on ABC:

STEPHANOPOULOS: So on taxes, are you a “read my lips” candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?
MCCAIN: No new taxes I do not — in fact, I could see an argument if our economy continues to deteriorate for lower interest rates, lower tax rates and certainly decreasing corporate tax rates, which are the second-highest in the world, giving people the ability to write off depreciation in a year, elimination of the AMT. There’s a lot of things that I would think we should to relieve that burden, including, obviously, as we all know, simplification of the tax code.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But under no circumstances would you increase taxes?
MCCAIN: No.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So on taxes, are you a “read my lips” candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?
MCCAIN: No new taxes I do not — in fact, I could see an argument if our economy continues to deteriorate for lower interest rates, lower tax rates and certainly decreasing corporate tax rates, which are the second-highest in the world, giving people the ability to write off depreciation in a year, elimination of the AMT. There’s a lot of things that I would think we should to relieve that burden, including, obviously, as we all know, simplification of the tax code.
STEPHANOPOULOS: But under no circumstances would you increase taxes?
MCCAIN: No.

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/17/mccain-makes-no-new-taxes-pledge/

Lets look at them both. What a difference a day makes as the old saying goes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu92O1PL6UY

As Patrick Henry said:"I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging the future but by the past."

Read the excerpted part from an essay below or read the whole essay if you don't understand by now why conservatives HAD problems with George H. W. Bush also. With that being understood, why would his endorsement of someone excite them?

"The impact of the pledge was considerable, and many believe it helped Bush win the 1988 United States presidential election. Once president, however, Bush agreed to raise several taxes as part of a 1990 budget agreement. This has been attributed to a declining economy, ballooning budget deficits, and the need to compromise with the Democrat-controlled Congress. This reversal caused great controversy, especially in the more conservative wing of the Republican Party. "

Excerpted from an essay by Michael R. Beschloss:

At the Republican Convention in Detroit, Ronald Reagan worried about the depth of Bush's convictions. At first he resisted advice to choose for Vice President the man who had gotten the second most votes in the primaries. He privately disparaged Bush's ability to "stand up to the pressure of being President": "I'm concerned about turning the country over to him." But after former President Ford withdrew his name from consideration, Reagan swallowed his doubts, made the call, and asked Bush whether he could support the party platform, the most conservative in forty years.
This was no small question. During the primaries, Bush had derided Reagan's hallmark pledge to cut taxes while hugely increasing the defense budget as "voodoo economics." He had supported abortion rights. But, willing to pay the price for political rebirth, Bush immediately told Reagan that he could support the platform "wholeheartedly." .....
Bush's eight years as Reagan's number two were made miserable by his ostentatious effort to convince what he privately called the "extra-chromosome" conservatives that he was not some kind of closet one-world liberal. Bush's vice-presidential predecessor, Walter Mondale, had warned him after the 1980 election that "a President does not want and the public does not respect a Vice President who does nothing but deliver fulsome praise of a President." ....
But Bush now felt his only chance for President in 1988 lay in winning over Reagan and his increasingly dominant wing of the party. On the simple level of private character, he showed admirable loyalty. More than any other vice president of the post-war era, Bush refused to allow sunlight between himself and his President. He eschewed background interviews with reporters designed to make himself look good at the boss's expense and used all public opportunities to demonstrate himself as a Reaganite, at one moment incautiously saying, "I'm for Mr. Reagan, blindly!" He defended himself by saying that in his family, loyalty was "not considered a character flaw."
It was the unrelenting ardor of that loyalty, from a Vice President who had once so disagreed with the Reaganites, that critics considered a character flaw. .......
During the (1988) campaign, Bush had encouraged the impression that his first years in office might be tantamount to Reagan's third term, with many Reagan appointees held over and the former President perhaps flown in from California from time to time as a kind of political godfather. That did not happen. Few high officials survived from the era of Reagan into that of Bush. During the Bush presidency, the forty-first President, who still held the hearts of most Republicans and to whom Bush owed his office, appeared in the White House exactly twice. Many conservatives suspected that by thumbing his nose at Reaganism, the new President, intoxicated by victory, was paying them back for all the years of humiliations while courting the right.
If they were correct, Bush was showing dangerous hubris and self-indulgence. The Republican Party, if anything, was growing more conservative than ever. If Bush did not wish to expend the effort to try moving his party to the center, as Eisenhower had attempted and failed to do, it would have been more sensible for the President to show that he understood the balance of forces within his party. But, buoyed by his high approval ratings, Bush gave signs of allowing himself to believe that he was unsinkable. His "what-me-worry?" attitude culminated in July 1990, when he reneged on his supreme campaign promise not to raise taxes. This told conservatives once and for all that Bush was not really one of them. .....

Where Have All The Debates (Flowers) Gone?

Gideon Henry — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:01:00 GMT

Where Have All The Debates (Flowers) Gone?

Is it just me or did it not too long ago seem like there was a debate every night? Well maybe not every night but there were a lot. What has happened? Now that it is down to a couple of candidates in both parties wouldn't this really be the time to have a lot of debates?

Why the silence on debates? Hillary Clinton has called for debates with Obama but he hasn't bit on them yet. John McCain doesn't want to debate Mike Huckabee. What if McCain was questioned on the economy? What if his noted temper surfaced? Mike Huckabee would be glad to debate McCain.

Why don't the networks come up with some debates? The facts are this. If the networks will come up with some debate dates and every candidate will show up. How can Obama not show up at a debate Clinton is attending? How can McCain not show up at a debate Huckabee is attending? I know McCain is attempting to act like the nomination is his. Hardly campaigning in Virginia. Is this not a little slap of the face of voters?

Remember the debates one network had where both parties were at the same venue and debated the same night? They even came out and shook hands between the two debates.
I know MSNBC needs ratings. This would be a good time and chance for them to pull in some ratings.

Set the date and time, have a debate for both parties. Clinton and Huckabee will show up. If the other two won't then Clinton and Huckabee can debate. What kind of press would that get. Or better yet have a debate of all 4 candidates. Why wait till October?

FOX, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, where are the debates. Why aren't one of you coming up with some debates for people to take part in? Hmmm! Could it be because the one you have declared to be the winner or the other one you favor are ahead?

Why so many debates and when it finally gets down to a number that the debates could provide much information, there are NONE?

What Does The Kansas Vote Say?

Gideon Henry — Sun, 10 Feb 2008 06:26:00 GMT

What Does The Kansas Vote Say?





I believe that the Kansas caucus vote today for the republicans said a number of things. It made it clear how much more work John McCain has to do to win over the conservative vote.

The article I wrote the other day about this being a football came, let me revisit real quickly. Do you remember the last super bowl? If you watched it you saw where the game was over, EXCEPT there was time on the clock and they had to come back on the field and run one more play.

Mike Huckabee crushed John McCain in Kansas. Still everyone it seems wants to talk about NOT how McCain got crushed in this race BUT how Huckabee has NO chance of winning. There is still a lot of time left in the game. Anything can happen. McCain has a temper. McCain isn't good in talking about the economy. Where has all of the debates gone too?

At least Mike Huckabee isn't letting down all of his supporters that have worked so hard for him. If nothing else he is showing John McCain and OTHERS (old guard Republicans and more) what a problem McCain has with the conservative base.

It looks like Huckabee has won Louisiana. Washington state they have stopped the counting for the night but Huckabee could win it and if not it will be Very close.

Tonight also shows that the people aren't listening to the media or the establishment. Every where you look or listen the drums are beating that Huckabee can't win or McCain has the nomination. For the elections to turn out like they have tonight with all the drum beating for McCain, that speaks volumes.   People STILL want to be heard. Here is hoping that they will go out in upcoming elections and speak LOUD!

There are MANY attempting to control the outcome of these elections and they aren't ALL the Media. There are a LOT of ESTABLISHMENT players who are trying to take back control.

Let the people listen and let the people decide what is best. Let the people think, they actually are smart enough to make a decision without the help of the talking heads or the old establishment.

What If It Was A Football Game?

Gideon Henry — Sat, 09 Feb 2008 01:43:00 GMT

What If It Was A Football Game?

How Easy Are Our Thoughts Controlled?

Can The Media McCain Train Be Stopped?

No matter what you are listening too or watching you hear the same thing. McCain can't be stopped. Why is Huckabee staying in the race? Huckabee is running for Vice President. There is no way Huckabee can win the nomination. The sad thing about that last statement is that it has been put out there by the Media LONG before Romney dropped out.

If everybody buys into "McCain can't be stopped", then guess what? He can't be stopped.
Let us look at this as a football game. You remember that sport don't you? Just a few days ago a game was played called the Super Bowl.

One team was the New England Patriots. They were 18 - 0. No losses and they were destined to be the champions, to win everything. They were going against the New York Giants. The Giants for a long time in their season were struggling just to finish above .500 for the season. The last game of the season before the playoffs the Giants were defeated by the Patriots.

Listening to almost everyone the Giants should have just stayed home. Think about the carbon imprint they would have saved. When the game was over the Patriots had been defeated. The underdog Giants WON!

If you thought about the Republican Nomination Process as a football game it would be about 5 1/2 minutes into the 3rd quarter. There are 15 minutes in a quarter and 4 quarters in a game. With that being said the Huckabee team is down by a big score. But there is STILL enough time in the game to try and win it. You can't win it by holding your head down thinking there is no way to win this game.

It is time for a few hail mary passes, a few hawg wild plays. An appropriate play since Huckabee is from Arkansas. A Hawg Wild Formation was run by the University Of Arkansas football team the past two seasons.

How To Stop Or Slow Down The Media McCain Train:

I suggested this in a earlier article before Romney suspended his race. It would have worked for Romney because he has the money and that isn't a issue. What I suggested was that Mitt Romney announce who his Vice President running mate would be. I suggested that he try to bring someone on board like Newt Gingrich.

A person like Newt Gingrich (if Romney could have talked him into coming on board) would have gotten the media buzz. Also what better person to help with how to battle the democrats and come up with a plan to submit to the voters? A plan does need to be laid out, not only for the Presidential race but also for the congressional races. As I stated in a article the other day, the senate and congressional races are the most important races. With them you can get people in to stop or slow down the liberal agenda. I heard Rush Limbaugh picking up on that today. He too was saying what I had put in an earlier article about how important the congress could be in all of this.

Since Mitt Romney has only suspended his race and has kept control of his delegates, I assume that he could change his mind and get back in if something odd happened. So what could make something odd happen?

There are STILL 3 people in the Republican Presidential Race. Mike Huckabee, Ron Paul and that guy from Arizona. As I stated in another article John McCain always looked like he thought Ron Paul was crazy when Dr. Paul would comment on certain things. But after watching John McCain's expression when Dr. Paul asked him a question about the economy, and after listening to him stumble to try and come up with an answer, I may be wrong. It may be as simple as John McCain had the funny looks because he simply doesn't understand the issues of the economy, which was shown by Ron Paul's question to him. If you want to see it go here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJ1OB2iLxcY

Mike Huckabee could still announce who he would choose for Vice President. Then he could put that person out on the trail. A person like Newt Gingrich would get the press and also get people excited and help bring money in. If he couldn't get Newt to come on board he could still come up with someone else that could strengthen him and get the press.

It would also FORCE all of the other candidates to do the same (democrats also). Today McCain was asked about Vice President and he didn't answer the question, he said it was too early. Why is it too early? I know you would want to save that for press later, but WHY NOT NOW? It is important everyone knows and if it is so certain McCain has this nomination then why not? Of course if McCain made the wrong pick it might slow his train and if Huckabee made the right one it might speed up his train. Same thing for Clinton or Obama. But why not force the issue and make everyone lay that card on the table?

If Huckabee would do this and could get the right person on board it could really shake things up. People are looking for something to excite them. This would be one of those plays in the football game that if it was successful it could change the momentum of the game. The score of the game is such that it is time to put in the Hawg Wild Formation.

People want to make fun of Ron Paul, most of the ones that do so don't understand what he is saying. It is so foreign to what they are use to hearing that it sounds very strange to them. IF these people who want to make fun of Ron Paul would do their work, and research some of the issues he brings up, they might then understand what he is really saying. They might then also understand why his supporters are so passionate about Dr. Ron Paul.

The big three conservative radio talk show hosts tried to destroy Huckabee's campaign when they were trying to push Romney to the top. They all three really have a problem with McCain. They still have a problem with him. Here is another play that could change the game.

Let some of these big radio hosts come on board and push Ron Paul. One reason Ron Paul isn't being taken seriously is because he is either left out of a debate or overlooked mostly when he is allowed in one. Since there is ONLY 3 left if some would get behind him imagine the press. There is a reason people who like Ron Paul work so hard for him. If you want to stop McCain and don't want to get behind Huckabee then get behind Ron Paul. At least enough to get him attention so people will be able to really understand where he stands. A lot of what Ron Paul says people don't like hearing. But for our country's sake the people need to hear it.

Remember how the name Huckabee sounded kind of funny? It doesn't sound so funny now does it? Well if Ron Paul was allowed to speak his truth's enough and people would do a little work and research, then what he is saying wouldn't be sounding funny. If you really want to stop McCain get a forum where Ron Paul is allowed to ask John McCain a few questions. Get him ten minutes to ask McCain questions and he will destroy him. The ten minutes doesn't include the time McCain will fumble around to attempt to answer them. Hell, let Dr. Paul ask McCain five minutes of questions and he will destroy him.

One of the issues that American's understand and care about is closing our borders. Again I ask how can you really say we are fighting a war on terror and we REFUSE to close our borders. Another way to slow the McCain Train is shine the light on one of his advisors. Juan Hernandez. If you watch any of the talk cable news shows you have seen this guy.

http://www.juanhernandez.org/

Open borders advocate Juan Hernandez has joined the McCain campaign

GLENN: Here it is, here's John McCain.

VOICE: I wonder if you agree with those policies. If so, explain it to me. And if not, why is he on your staff.

McCAIN: He's on my staff because he supports my policies and my proposals and my legislative proposal to secure the borders first, that no one will receive Social Security benefits who is in this country illegally. I don't know what his previous positions are, other previous positions are but he supports mine. I have nothing to do with his. And he has volunteered to help me with outreach to our Hispanic citizenry as that is his reach as I outreach to every citizen in America. I've made very clear my position on immigration, made very clear on my position on Social Security and, of course, I am grateful that we have so many people who came from Ireland to the United States of America and anybody else who can come here legally under the right system and that's the only system that I would ever support and I have no idea but I will check into the information you've given me. But I want to promise you I will secure our borders. I will not allow anyone to come here illegally. I will not allow anyone to receive Social Security or any other benefit because they have come here illegally and broken our laws.

GLENN: Okay. That's John McCain. Now, it's so disingenuous to say he doesn't know who this man is or his policies. This is a guy who used to work for Vicente Fox. He is the most open border guy you could possibly imagine. Here's just one clip of Juan Hernandez, and we've got tons of them and we'll be playing them over the next few days. Here's just one clip of Juan Hernandez on TV.

HERNANDEZ: I don't think that we need to build walls to control immigration. We are the 21st century now and we're a country that has always broken down walls. Once again with regard to securing the borders, we need to work with Mexico. We're never going to have a secure border. We're not going to put a wall up for these hundreds and hundreds thousands of miles. We have to work with our neighbors. We need to think now for the future. Canada, the United States and Mexico as a block.

GLENN: Canada, Mexico and America as a block. That's who this guy is. Michelle?

MALKIN: A block, not a region. He said it many times. He also, when he worked for this Mexican bureaucracy called the presidential office for Mexican abroad, what he did was he spent his time traveling all across our country lobbying local, state and federal officials for driver's license for illegal aliens. He defended his operators who were carrying illegal aliens to the country and who promoted extending banking privileges here in the United States to illegal aliens, lobbied to get lower rates for them so that they could send home billions of dollars in remittances back to their country. The guy does not believe in borders. He is a senior fellow at something called the Reform Institute which is a think tank that John McCain founded and it has come under scrutiny by the mainstream media because it underscores John McCain's hypocrisy not just on open borders but also on campaign finance because he's used his supposedly nonpartisan, nonprofit thinking to solicit donations from big donors who he then goes and crusades for while he's sitting on Senate committees. At this reform institute which is in part funded with George Soros money, Juan Hernandez was in charge of leading the lobbying campaign for John McCain's amnesty effort last year. And this reform institute also sponsored an art contest for students where they spent their time demonizing the border. And you can go and look. I linked this on my website, to all of the art that compares the walls our borders and our border fences to the Berlin wall which keeps people in instead of walling people out to prevent invasion, to prevent undermining our sovereignty, to prevent encroaching of our laws. And for McCain to have the gall to stand there and tell that voter in Florida who, by the way, learned about this Juan Hernandez thing by looking at our research on the Internet, for him to say that he supports securing the border first when he's got a guy outreaching to illegal aliens to persuade them to make John McCain President? It's more than nauseating.

Thank you for this part Glenn Beck www.glennbeck.com and Michelle Malkin www.michellemalkin.com .

So who in the Media will start asking John McCain about Juan Hernandez EVERYDAY????

Laura Ingraham Showing Fairness As Broadcaster

Gideon Henry — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 05:50:00 GMT

Laura Ingraham Showing Fairness As Broadcaster

www.lauraingraham.com

I was very pleased to listen to the Laura Ingraham program and hear her treat Mike Huckabee with respect and fairness. Even though she was a supporter of Mitt Romney. If only the top three conservative broadcasters had been so fair in their treatment of Huckabee. They could (and should) take a lesson from Laura Ingraham. She was also on the stop McCain band wagon but she wasn't doing it by trying to destroy another. If you have never heard her, go to her website for the stations that carry her or to get her podcast. Give her a listen, her fairness deserves it.

Principal Matters - Who Will Sell Their Soul To Win An Election?

Gideon Henry — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 03:34:00 GMT

Principal Matters - Who Will Sell Their Soul To Win An Election?

What has changed in the last 24 hours? Has John McCain saw a light in the sky that changed his life and the way he sees life? Has John McCain had a miracle awakening where his position on important matters are changed?

I believe the answer to those questions are no, but Mitt Romney has suspended(what does that mean?) his race for President. A great speech he gave at CPAC. Too bad he hadn't been giving those speeches before. He gave his speech at CPAC before John McCain talked.

So now what happens? Many of the establishment are already jumping on board. John McCain wasn't a True Conservative (even though he is spinning it in his ads) 24 hours ago and he still isn't a True Conservative. This is where Principal Matters. If he was wrong for the Party 24 hours ago, he is still wrong.

Two other candidates also remain, even though listening to the cable news channels there is only one more and he doesn't have a chance. If they get out they don't have a chance. They should stay in to give the public a fair hearing.

It is important for Conservatives to stand up for their principals, they can't sale out (or at least shouldn't) in an attempt to win an election. Especially when the candidate is so similar as the Democrats in numerous ways.

What is one of the worst things that could happen to this country? Clinton or Obama getting elected President. What could be worse? A Republican running as a conservative that will govern more like a Democrat.

If the Democrat wins even with forty percent (if there is a third party candidate) they will claim a mandate and try to govern that way. If McCain won he would govern the way he feels is right. If you are a conservative you can forget about him attempting to govern that way. He won't. Remember: McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Lieberman, Gang Of 14, 2 Votes against Bush Tax Cut.

As bad as it would be for the country if a Democrat got in and tried to pass their liberal programs, it would be far worse for a Republican to get in disguised as a conservative and they try to pass the SAME type of programs.

What should True Conservatives do? You don't want to vote for Clinton or Obama. If they win the more votes they get, the more they will use the term they will elected by a mandate. You don't want to vote for someone of your party if you KNOW they won't stand for what you think is right and important. Everyone should vote. That is a right we don't treat with the respect we should. Find a third party candidate that is closer to your way of thinking. Vote but make it a protest vote.

More important is to get involved with the House of Representives and Senate races. Find people who are True Conservatives that will stand up to the liberal democrats and republicans and work to get them elected. A President can't get a bill or program enacted if there is enough people in office to stand in their way.

This is important to keep the Liberal Candidates (there are three still in the races) in check once someone is elected. Also don't fall into the liberal trap of everyone saying McCain can't be stopped. It isn't over yet, as much as the liberal press would like to think and would like you to think. If you are in a state that hasn't had their primary yet, you can still make a difference and surprise the media. If you are in a state that has already had their primary then start to look seriously at the House of Representives races and the Senate races if you have a Senator coming up for election. They are suppose to represent you, they work for you, start holding them accountable.

Most important stay true to your principals and don't sale them out to someone who doesn't have the same principals.

McCain The Worst Choice For America

Gideon Henry — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:51:00 GMT

McCain The Worst Choice For America

John McCain would be the worst choice to run for President under the Republican banner. The main reason is that he doesn't embrace the main things about the Republican party that draws people to it. The main reason is that John McCain is more a liberal Democrat then he is a Republican.

The country doesn't need Two Democrat Parties. If John (Juan) McCain becomes the head of the Republican Party that is where it is headed. Evcn if Mitt Romney gets out of the race, McCain can still be stopped.

To stop him people have to believe he can be stopped. Then work to stop him. There will still be two other candidates in the race. Mike Huckabee can stop John McCain if people believe he can and start working for that. Huckabee is closer to the Republican Party then John McCain. Huckabee is more likable then McCain.

McCain will not beat either Clinton or Obama. The people that sing his praises are the same people that will pull push the button for Clinton or Obama over McCain if they have that choice.

We WON'T win with McCain. We could win with Huckabee and still keep part of our soul.

What Happens If Romney Drops Out?

Gideon Henry — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 17:46:00 GMT

What Happens If Romney Drops Out?

If Romney drops out it doesn't give the nomination to Juan McCain. There will still be two other candidates in the race. The party shouldn't secede its principals to McCain. He isn't the party and he shouldn't be running for President under the party banner.

Sean Hannity Imploding! Here - If Frogs Had Wings!

Gideon Henry — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:20:00 GMT

Sean Hannity Imploding!

What Makes Rush Right?

After Super Tuesday it was interesting to listen to Talk Radio on Crazy Wednesday. First let us ask the question about Rush Limbaugh. He stated on his radio show today that there is NO Way Huckabee is going to win the nomination. I have a simple question for all of the Czar's of Talk Radio. The ones championing that Mike Huckabee get out of the race so Mitt Romney can take John McCain out.

The question is this: You want a person who CAN'T win the nomination get out of the race so that a person that CAN'T beat this loser in a lot of states can take Juan McCain out. If Romney can't beat Huckabee, what makes him the one to beat McCain? Couldn't the same thing be said about Romney? That he should get out of the race so that Huckabee can take out McCain? If you can't say that then why? Besides of the fact that Romney has more money?

Speaking of money. It is clear Romney has a lot more money they Huckabee to try and get his message out. Romney has clearly used this advantage. The only problem is that it doesn't translate into votes. So WHY should it be Huckabee instead of Romney who should get out?

Sir Sean Hannity imploded on his national radio program today. How bad was it?

One statement Hannity said was Huckabee was mad at him because he endorsed Romney. Sir Sean is good at taking a few words and twist them to go with the point he is attempting to make. I would think IF Huckabee is upset with Sir Sean Hannity, it wouldn't be because he endorsed Romney, BUT because Hannity and others are working at undermining Huckabee's campaign to try and get him out of the race.

Here is where Hannity went completely overboard or off the planet. Hannity talks about Ron Paul being out there, Hannity really had to reach to come up with this:

If Huckabee would have dropped out after the Florida Primary (after all he did place 4th) and then if Rudy Giuliani had stayed in, how different would have Super Tuesday looked. Then Hannity went into which states Romney MIGHT have won and Giuliani MIGHT have won then they could have stopped McCain.

WOW, as I write this Hannity just brought this up again on his TV show, not in so much detail but about Florida and if Huckabee had gotten out and Giuliani stayed in. Okay let us look at it another way since Hannity wants to deal with the issue if frogs had wings.

After New Hampshire if Giuliani got out (he place 4th there) or if Fred Thompson got out (he placed 6th there) then Mike Huckabee would have won South Carolina. Then if that had happened who would have won Florida? Why am I asking such a question? I don't know? It doesn't do any good, it doesn't change anything. It is kind of like if I had played those lottery numbers last night I would have won it.

So if it doesn't make any sense or do any good for me to ask such a question then what does it make sense for Sean Hannity to ask such a question? Here is an example of Sean Hannity talking about what would happen if Frogs had wings.

If We Wish To Be Free!

Time To Hand Out Pink Slips

Time To Hand Out Pink Slips

Do Democrats Really Want To Share Credit With Republicans On Good Ideas?

Do Democrats Really Want To Share Credit With Republicans On Good Ideas?

Do Republicans Really Want To Be In Power?

Do Republicans Really Want To Be In Power?

Congratulations President-Elect Obama

What Barack Obama Will Do To You!

Socialist America

You Have Seen History

If You Watched Sarah Palin's Speech You Have Seen History

Is Juan McCain The Anti-Christ?

2 Corinthians 11

2 Thessalonians 2:3-12

1 John 4

Revelation 13

Commenting on a comment

The Crisis of the Crisis

The Crisis of the Crisis

America's Biggest Homegrown Terror Cell

Three Reasons Conservatives Are Excited About Bush 41's Endorsement Of McCain

Three Reasons Conservatives Are Excited About Bush 41's Endorsement Of McCain Read My Lips!

Where Have All The Debates (Flowers) Gone?

What Does The Kansas Vote Say?

What If It Was A Football Game?

Laura Ingraham Showing Fairness As Broadcaster

Principal Matters - Who Will Sell Their Soul To Win An Election?

McCain The Worst Choice For America

What Happens If Romney Drops Out?

What Happens If Romney Drops Out?If Romney drops out it doesn't give the nomination to Juan McCain. There will still be two other candidates in the race. The party shouldn't secede its principals to McCain. He isn't the party and he shouldn't be running for President under the party banner.

Sean Hannity Imploding! Here - If Frogs Had Wings!

Three Reasons Conservatives Are Excited About Bush 41's Endorsement Of McCain

Read My Lips!

What Happens If Romney Drops Out?

If Romney drops out it doesn't give the nomination to Juan McCain. There will still be two other candidates in the race. The party shouldn't secede its principals to McCain. He isn't the party and he shouldn't be running for President under the party banner.