How Good Is Your Memory?

Doesn't it seem like there is always SOME type of Crisis that we need to deal with.  Or should I say that the government will have to deal with.  Some of the ways government remains and gains power is by presenting fear to the general population.  Fear about something that ONLY the government will be able to handle in the proper way.  This will be the first in a series of articles about Crisis.

THE TRUTH THAT WILL SET YOU FREE!
It IS ALL about the power.  There is no such thing as coincidence.  Very FEW will step in front of another to stop a bullet. 
Those who drink from the grapes of power have trouble saying NO to one more glass of wine.  You have freedom as long as you do what the government says you should do.  Is that the freedom our founding fathers envisioned?
Government gains more power and is questioned less when fear and safety is brought into the picture.  Once people have tasted power, they don't want to give up that taste.  After tasting the grapes of power for too long, people start believing that it is THEIR right to continue to taste that wine.  Not their honor, their right.  When they get to that mindset, their actions are more about keeping themselves in power then doing what is best and right for the people.

The Crisis of the War on Terror!
I will deal with many crisis but the first one, let it be the so called War On Terror!  What has that war brought to this country?  I guess I could say thank goodness we invaded Iraq, can you image how high gas prices would have been by now if we had stayed in our own country?

What the war on terror has brought us.  We have to wear socks now that are clean and no holes if we are going to fly.  We don't actually have to, but it could be embarrassing.  Depending on the mood of the people in charge we may or may not be able to take shampoo, toothpaste, nail cllppers etc. with us on our flight.

The War on Terror have gotten a great word ,PATRIOT,  hijacked by congress in passing laws that take our rights away.  By calling it the Patriot Act they attempt to make it so that anyone that would oppose it would BE, UNPATRIOTIC.  A good way to keep people in check and quite.

As soon as this act or parts of it are due to expire, then we hear how much MORE in danger we will be if it isn't renewed.  But in truth what is in more danger is OUR rights as AMERICANS.  The very people who would and who have killed our people.  The very people who would take our freedoms away from us have had to do nothing more then fly the planes into the buildings.  Our elected representatives have done the rest as far as taking some of our rights and freedoms away from us.

If Bin Laden was so important in this War of Terror, then why did we not continue with him until we found him?  Could it be because he would be more valuable to the people in power alive and free then dead or captured?  Why go into Iraq before the job with Bin Laden was finished?  Wouldn't there have been time after that job was finished to then go after Iraq?

Do you remember why we went into Iraq?  Weapons of Mass Destruction.  WMD's.  Now after none were found I REMEMBER the people in power saying there were more reasons then JUST WMD's for going into Iraq.  The trouble with that is that I ALSO REMEMBER Colin Powell going to the United Nations outlining the reason for going into Iraq.  WMD's was the reason.  Once they didn't find WMD's they changed their story or reasons.  The ONLY problem with that is that I REMEMBER Powell's talk at the United Nations.  Some of this stuff would be so much easier to believe if my memory wasn't so good.

So once no WMD's were found and Saddam was pulled out of the Rat Hole I had a simple solution to the problem.  Put him back in power.  Don't you think he would have played ball with us?  Let HIM get his country back into control and remember we dug you out of a rat hole, we can do it again.  But no that would have been too simple.  Instead it was very important to make sure he was dead.  What was such the rush?  As far as that goes what was such the rush of killing the Oklahoma City  Bomber?  Both people still had much information, so why such the rush to close the lips of that information?  Remember there are no coincidences.

The war on terror has been a very high cost of blood and treasure.  The dems like to use that wording a lot.  But billions and billions of dollars have been sent to a country we invaded.  Thousands of our young people have lost their life's, and many more thousands have lost body parts.  Remember Viet Nam?  I do and back then you had old men and some not so old playing with the lives of young American boys sending them to fight a war that was NEVER declared.  Have we actually declared war on Iraq???

NOW the difference is that we have old men and some not so old, and old women and some not so old, playing with the lives of our young American boys and girls in a war (was it ever declared?).  So I guess the BIG question I HAVE to ask about the War On Terror is this.  If the War on Terror is SO important, and if the main reason is too keep our country and people safe, then WHY after 6 1/2 years since 911 are our borders STILL SO OPEN!!!!!!

IF IT IS about keeping our people safe and our country safe, wouldn't one of the first things you do is make SURE it is difficult for people to enter our country without us knowing about it???  It just makes common sense to me that closing our borders would be one of the FIRST things we should do.  I would think that most of our young people would rather be protecting our borders from invasion then being the invaders.  If the terrorists can't get here, then won't it be harder for them to hurt us?  If our young people are going to have to serve in a desert wouldn't most rather be closer to home?  At least this way maybe they could get home more to see their families and be serving in a safer place.

The problem is NOT our young people serving.  They will protect us, they have already given so much.  The problem is not with them.  The problem is with the people in power on BOTH sides , that are playing with their lives.  Making them serve tour after tour of duty.

The Crisis Of The War On Terror!
If it is such a big deal then WHY aren't our borders closed?  WHY?  You can't say we haven't had enough time to close them.  We have had over six years.  If our safety and the safety of our country is so important to take away people's rights and freedoms (such as the Patriot Act), then WHY isn't it important enough to seal our borders??? 

How can it be a crisis, how can it be a war on terror, when one of the most important things to do to assure our safety ISN'T done?  Is it as much a War On Terror or is it more a War On The Rights Of Americans?

Three Reasons Conservatives Are Excited About Bush 41's Endorsement Of McCain

      Read My Lips!                                                                           

It was interesting listening to the reporting today of George H.W. Bush endorsing John McCain.  Many talking about how this should help win over the conservative members of the party that have been objecting to McCain.  Of course the many making such statements would have liberal leanings if the truth was known.  Since he was Vice-President under President Reagan for eight years, then the endorsement would surely win them over.

With that reasoning the conservatives must really be dumb.  Or is it the liberal pundits?  Let's examine why like John McCain, George H.W. Bush also had problems with the conservative members of the republican party.

So why would the conservative members of the Republican Party be so excited about Bush 41 endorsing McCain?  Let us visit three reasons.

"Voodoo Economics"    Some of us haven't forgotten that BEFORE Ronald Reagan gave George Bush life again  and picked him to be the Vice President that they had a very combative battle for the Republican nomination.

"New World Order"  As much as some, maybe many would like for you to think
 that there is nothing to the talk of a New World Order.  There is something to it.  Do some research, if not for yourself, if not for your country, then for the children.  If you don't believe in the New World Order, then don't be lazy, do some research.  It is real and it is out there for you to find.   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CWBTL33MpA 
also this one  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pVmL2RyYe4&feature=related

Listen to this, the words that are said.  Do some research and the words will jump out at you.

"Read My Lips"  Who can forget that? " Read My Lips, No New Taxes."  Until he teamed with the democrats.  Wow, could that also be something that could happen with John McCain??   Watch the video and hear what he said, then compare it to what he did. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP9_kkzfN-w  
also listen to this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5DZBFbMdjI&feature=RecentlyWatched&page=1&t=t&f=b


McCain on ABC:

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/17/mccain-makes-no-new-taxes-pledge/

Lets look at them both.  What a difference a day makes as the old saying goes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu92O1PL6UY

As Patrick Henry said:"I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging the future but by the past." 

Read the excerpted part from an essay below or read the whole essay if you don't understand by now why conservatives HAD problems with George H. W. Bush also.  With that being understood, why would his endorsement of someone excite them?


 "The impact of the pledge was considerable, and many believe it helped Bush win the 1988 United States presidential election. Once president, however, Bush agreed to raise several taxes as part of a 1990 budget agreement. This has been attributed to a declining economy, ballooning budget deficits, and the need to compromise with the Democrat-controlled Congress. This reversal caused great controversy, especially in the more conservative wing of the Republican Party. "

Excerpted from an essay by Michael R. Beschloss:

Where Have All The Debates (Flowers) Gone?

                                                                                          

Is it just me or did it not too long ago seem like there was a debate every night?  Well maybe not every night but there were a lot.  What has happened?  Now that it is down to a couple of candidates in both parties wouldn't this really be the time to have a lot of debates?

Why the silence on debates?  Hillary Clinton has called for debates with Obama but he hasn't bit on them yet.  John McCain doesn't want to debate Mike Huckabee.  What if McCain was questioned on the economy?  What if his noted temper surfaced?  Mike Huckabee would be glad to debate McCain.

Why don't the networks come up with some debates?  The facts are this.  If the networks will come up with some debate dates and every candidate will show up.  How can Obama not show up at a debate Clinton is attending?  How can McCain not show up at a debate Huckabee is attending?  I know McCain is attempting to act like the nomination is his.  Hardly campaigning in Virginia.  Is this not a little slap of the face of voters?

Remember the debates one network had where both parties were at the same venue and debated the same night?  They even came out and shook hands between the two debates.
I know MSNBC needs ratings.  This would be a good time and chance for them to pull in some ratings.

Set the date and time, have a debate for both parties.  Clinton and Huckabee will show up.  If the other two won't then Clinton and Huckabee can debate.  What kind of press would that get.  Or better yet have a debate of all 4 candidates.  Why wait till October?

FOX, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS, NBC, where are the debates.  Why aren't one of you coming up with some debates for people to take part in?   Hmmm!  Could it be because the one you have declared to be the winner or the other one you favor are ahead?

Why so many debates and when it finally gets down to a number that the debates could provide much information, there are NONE?

What Does The Kansas Vote Say?   

                                                                     
 
                                                                     

I believe that the Kansas caucus vote today for the republicans said a number of things.  It made it clear how much more work John McCain has to do to win over the conservative vote. 

The article I wrote the other day about this being a football came, let me revisit real quickly.  Do you remember the last super bowl?  If you watched it you saw where the game was over, EXCEPT there was time on the clock and they had to come back on the field and run one more play.

Mike Huckabee crushed John McCain in Kansas.  Still everyone it seems wants to talk about NOT how McCain got crushed in this race BUT how Huckabee has NO chance of winning.  There is still a lot of time left in the game.  Anything can happen.  McCain has a temper.  McCain isn't good in talking about the economy.  Where has all of the debates gone too?

At least Mike Huckabee isn't letting down all of his supporters that have worked so hard for him.  If nothing else he is showing John McCain and OTHERS (old guard Republicans and more) what a problem McCain has with the conservative base.

It looks like Huckabee has won Louisiana.  Washington state they have stopped the counting for the night but Huckabee could win it and if not it will be Very close.

Tonight also shows that the people aren't listening to the media or the establishment.  Every where you look or listen the drums are beating that Huckabee can't win or McCain has the nomination.  For the elections to turn out like they have tonight with all the drum beating for McCain, that speaks volumes.   People STILL want to be heard.  Here is hoping that they will go out in upcoming elections and speak LOUD!

There are MANY attempting to control the outcome of these elections and they aren't ALL the Media.  There are a LOT of ESTABLISHMENT players who are trying to take back control.

Let the people listen and let the people decide what is best.  Let the people think, they actually are smart enough to make a decision without the help of the talking heads or the old establishment.

Principal Matters - Who Will Sell Their Soul To Win An Election?

What has changed in the last 24 hours?  Has John McCain saw a light in the sky that changed his life and the way he sees life?  Has John McCain had a miracle awakening where his position on important matters are changed?

I believe the answer to those questions are no, but Mitt Romney has suspended(what does that mean?) his race for President.  A great speech he gave at CPAC.  Too bad he hadn't been giving those speeches before.  He gave his speech at CPAC before John McCain talked.
 
So now what happens?  Many of the establishment are already jumping on board.  John McCain wasn't a True Conservative (even though he is spinning it in his ads) 24 hours ago and he still isn't a True Conservative.  This is where Principal Matters.  If he was wrong for  the Party 24 hours ago, he is still wrong.

Two other candidates also remain, even though listening to the cable news channels there is only one more and he doesn't have a chance.  If they get out they don't have a chance.  They should stay in to give the public a fair hearing.

It is important for Conservatives to stand up for their principals, they can't sale out (or at least shouldn't) in an attempt to win an election.  Especially when the candidate is so similar as the Democrats in numerous ways.

What is one of the worst things that could happen to this country?  Clinton or Obama getting elected President.  What could be worse?  A Republican running as a conservative that will govern more like a Democrat.

If the Democrat wins even with forty percent (if there is a third party candidate) they will claim a mandate and try to govern that way.  If McCain won he would govern the way he feels is right.  If you are a conservative you can forget about him attempting to govern that way.  He won't.  Remember:  McCain-Feingold, McCain-Kennedy, McCain-Lieberman, Gang Of 14, 2 Votes against Bush Tax Cut.

As bad as it would be for the country if a Democrat got in and tried to pass their liberal programs, it would be far worse for a Republican to get in disguised as a conservative and they try to pass the SAME type of programs.

What should True Conservatives do?  You don't want to vote for Clinton or Obama.  If they win the more votes they get, the more they will use the term they will elected by a mandate.  You don't want to vote for someone of your party if you KNOW they won't stand for what you think is right and important.  Everyone should vote.  That is a right we don't treat with the respect we should.  Find a third party candidate that is closer to your way of thinking.  Vote but make it a protest vote.

More important is to get involved with the House of Representives and Senate races.  Find people who are True Conservatives that will stand up to the liberal democrats and republicans and work to get them elected.  A President can't get a bill or program enacted if there is enough people in office to stand in their way.

This is important to keep the Liberal Candidates (there are three still in the races) in check once someone is elected.  Also don't fall into the liberal trap of everyone saying McCain can't be stopped.  It isn't over yet, as much as the liberal press would like to think and would like you to think.  If you are in a state that hasn't had their primary yet, you can still make a difference and surprise the media.  If you are in a state that has already had their primary then start to look seriously at the House of Representives races and the Senate races if you have a Senator coming up for election.  They are suppose to represent you, they work for you, start holding them accountable.

Most important stay true to your principals and don't sale them out to someone who doesn't have the same principals.

McCain The Worst Choice For America

John McCain would be the worst choice to run for President under the Republican banner.  The main reason is that he doesn't embrace the main things about the Republican party that draws people to it.  The main reason is that John McCain is more a liberal Democrat then he is a Republican.

The country doesn't need Two Democrat Parties.  If John (Juan) McCain becomes the head of the Republican Party that is where it is headed. Evcn if Mitt Romney gets out of the race, McCain can still be stopped.

To stop him people have to believe he can be stopped.  Then work to stop him.  There will still be two other candidates in the race.  Mike Huckabee can stop John McCain if people believe he can and start working for that.  Huckabee is closer to the Republican Party then John McCain.  Huckabee is more likable then McCain. 

McCain will not beat either Clinton or Obama.  The people that sing his praises are the same people that will pull push the button for Clinton or Obama over McCain if they have that choice.

We WON'T win with McCain.  We could win with Huckabee and still keep part of our soul.

What Happens If Romney Drops Out?

If Romney drops out it doesn't give the nomination to Juan McCain.  There will still be two other candidates in the race.  The party shouldn't secede its principals to McCain.  He isn't the party and he shouldn't be running for President under the party banner.

Sean Hannity Imploding!

What Makes Rush Right?

    

After Super Tuesday it was interesting to listen to Talk Radio on Crazy Wednesday.  First let us ask the question about Rush Limbaugh.  He stated on his radio show today that there is NO Way Huckabee is going to win the nomination.  I have a simple question for all of the Czar's of Talk Radio.  The ones championing that Mike Huckabee get out of the race so Mitt Romney can take John McCain out.

The question is this:  You want a person who CAN'T win the nomination get out of the race so that a person that CAN'T beat this loser in a lot of states can take Juan McCain out.  If Romney can't beat Huckabee, what makes him the one to beat McCain?  Couldn't the same thing be said about Romney?  That he should get out of the race so that Huckabee can take out McCain?  If you can't say that then why?  Besides of the fact that Romney has more money?

Speaking of money.  It is clear Romney has a lot more money they Huckabee to try and get his message out.  Romney has clearly used this advantage.  The only problem is that it doesn't translate into votes.  So WHY should it be Huckabee instead of Romney who should get out?

Sir Sean Hannity imploded on his national radio program today.  How bad was it?

One statement Hannity said was Huckabee was mad at him because he endorsed Romney.  Sir Sean is good at taking a few words and twist them to go with the point he is attempting to make.  I would  think IF Huckabee is upset with Sir Sean Hannity, it wouldn't be because he endorsed Romney, BUT because Hannity and others are working at undermining Huckabee's campaign to try and get him out of the race.

Here is where Hannity went completely overboard or off the planet.  Hannity talks about Ron Paul being out there, Hannity really had to reach to come up with this:

If Huckabee would have dropped out after the Florida Primary (after all he did place 4th) and then if Rudy Giuliani had stayed in, how different would have Super Tuesday looked.  Then Hannity went into which states Romney MIGHT have won and Giuliani MIGHT have won then they could have stopped McCain.

WOW, as I write this Hannity just brought this up again on his TV show, not in so much detail but about Florida and if Huckabee had gotten out and Giuliani stayed in.  Okay let us look at it another way since Hannity wants to deal with the issue if frogs had wings.

After New Hampshire if Giuliani got out (he place 4th there) or if Fred Thompson got out (he placed 6th there) then Mike Huckabee would have won South Carolina.  Then if that had happened who would have won Florida?  Why am I asking such a question?  I don't know?  It doesn't do any good, it doesn't change anything.  It is kind of like if I had played those lottery numbers last night I would have won it.

So if it doesn't make any sense or do any good for me to ask such a question then what does it make sense for Sean Hannity to ask such a question?  Here is an example of Sean Hannity talking about what would happen if Frogs had wings.

The Constitution guarantees Americans the right to be secure against all unreasonable seizures.  My home state of Texas is unfortunately planning on some very unreasonable seizures of land with the monstrous Trans Texas Corridor highway project.  The TTC plans call for a highway to cut through about 4,000 Texas miles, and with separate rail lines for passenger and freight, a multi-lane highway with separate truck lanes, utility and cable easements, this highway could be as wide as 1200 feet across.  In the end this project would consume something like half a million acres of land in Texas .  However, since the exact path of the road has not been determined, it is putting much more acreage in jeopardy, and in limbo.

Taking land is destructive enough.  But the perpetual threat of taking an undetermined amount of land is hanging over the heads of millions of Texans and putting their lives at a standstill.  Land is a store of wealth and a source of stability.  This highway project is tragically threatening that for so many Texans.

The principle of private property is the cornerstone to a free and prosperous society.  In situations where a colossal government land grab is a distinct possibility, investment or improvement becomes more risky with an uncertain future and tends not to happen.  How do you sell land that may or may not be taken by the government at some point in the not too distant future?  Who would buy it?  How do you cultivate or build on, or even near, land that may or may not be paved over and turned into a massive, noisy thoroughfare in a few years?

Even more insulting is the distinct possibility that, while the road will collect tolls and fees, making a private foreign firm billions of dollars in revenue, the costs of building it could be heavily borne by taxpayers.  So the costs will be socialized and the profits privatized.  Public-private partnership indeed!

From Washington I have voiced my staunch disapproval of taking these hard-working taxpayers' land for a private toll road, by introducing legislation (HR 5191) that simply states, "No Federal funds appropriated or made available before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act may be used by a unit of Federal, State, or local government to carry out the highway project known as the 'Trans-Texas Corridor'."  I am working hard in Congress to make sure that no Federal funding is used to undermine property rights in this way.

We should be focusing on guarding and securing our borders for the protection of the American people.  Instead we are paving the way for more and more people to cross the border as comfortably as possible.  And taking the family farm to do it.  It is an absolute outrage.

The Shocking Video Hillary Does NOT Want You To See!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMfUajhL24I

One thing is for sure John (Juan) McCain is no conservative. 
His new ad  the True Conservative is a lie.


If you like Clinton or Obama and their belief on how to govern, then don't feel bad about voting for John McCain.  You will be voting for the same type of person more then not.

If Clinton or Obama's thought process about policy and how to govern doesn't set right with you, then you shouldn't vote for McCain because there is some difference but he is closer to them then he is to the Republican party.

As I write this a person sits in for Rush Limbaugh  www.rushlimbaugh.com .  So far I haven't heard the spill that Mr. Gray was so strong with.  Let us hope we don't hear it.  Let us also hope that when Sean Hannity   www.hannity.com comes on that he won't speak those words.

Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity both have made it clear they have problems with Mike Huckabee, but it seems to me they have made up their mind.  With that it appears they have also closed their minds about him.  That is too bad.  I truly believe Mike Huckabee is a good man.  He has some very good ideas and he is likable.  Something people are overlooking.  There is something you feel when you watch Mike Huckabee speak as you did when you watched Ronald Reagan speak.  This is not from someone who is drinking the Huckabee Kool-aid but from someone who is looking at everyone and attempting to be fair and using common sense.

McCain NEEDS to be stopped.  He isn't conservative or even close.  I don't feel he is very nice even.  And he sure doesn't understand the economy.  Check the video I have linked a number of times.  BUT we shouldn't be trying to stop McCain by trying to destroy Huckabee's chances.  Don't let the southern accent cloud your way of hearing Mike Huckabee, our famous talk radio hosts.  To do so would be very unfair to your listeners and our country.  Talk up Romney if you want too, but don't talk down Huckabee.

Now Jason Lewis  http://www.ktlkfm.com/pages/jlewispersonality.html who is filling in for Rush Limbaugh is bashing Huckabee.  So will Sean Hannity pick up the same promote Romney by bashing Huckabee?  

Listen talk radio hosts.  Give facts about McCain if you want to stop him.  Talk Romney up if you want to help him stop McCain.  BUT DON'T try to destroy Huckabee's chances in your effort  to stop McCain.  Kind of sounds like the Clinton's doesn't it?

 Update:
Sean Hannity is keeping up with the bash Huckabee talking points.  Here is part of an email I just sent Sean.  He will ask a question but he doesn't want to hear an answer.  He just said it doesn't make sense "he is only attacking Romney and not McCain".  My email will tell him why and if Sean would think instead of attempting to push someone out of the race, he would think about this.  Here is the email I sent Sean Hannity:
 Come on Sean get over it,
Chip can't send an email without asking for money.  The points you make about Huckabee and Romney, maybe you should think about what you said.  Why does he attack Romney instead of McCain?  WHY are YOU saying that Huckabee is taking votes away from Romney?  It is because they attract some of the same voters.  As much as you want Huckabee to get out because he is taking votes from Romney, doesn't it make sense to attack the one where your votes will come from instead of the one where your votes won't come from???????
 
"It is natural to man to indulge in the illusions of hope"
GIDEON HENRY
http://blog.commonsensepatriot.com/
http://www.commonsensepatriot.com/

Here is an interview that Glenn Beck www.glennbeck.com  had with Michelle Malkin  http://michellemalkin.com 




 
                     Michelle Malkin 
            http://michellemalkin.com



Before you start trusting your safety and country and freedom to John McCain understand where he REALLY stands.

GLENN: From Radio City in Midtown Manhattan, this is the third most listened to show in all of America. I'm glad you're listening today. I will tell you that the staff at the Glenn Beck program has had an intervention on me about a half hour ago because I'm a little testy, quite frankly. It might have to do with internal bleeding that we haven't been able to find yet or, you know, the anemia or any of the other things going on in my life right now, the lack of sleep, et cetera, et cetera. Or it could just be boiled down to John McCain. And when I say John McCain, my frustration comes from I don't understand America that can say, look at how wrong John McCain has been. 70% of America says John McCain is wrong about immigration. They believe in securing the border, et cetera, et cetera. And he says he has an epiphany.

Well, now, when you listen to the American people, okay, great, I had an epiphany, I listened to the American people. The reason why I'm so upset is what you're going to hear in the next few minutes. It is something that most of America doesn't know and when you hear the facts laid out before you about John McCain, it should make your blood boil. Whether it will or not, I don't know, but it should. Michelle Malkin is here and she's gooding to lay the whole story out. Hi, Michelle.

MALKIN: Hi, Glenn.

GLENN: Have you ever seen such an audacious slap in the face to the American people as this?

MALKIN: I haven't felt one like this in a long time, Glenn. I'm still reeling from it. But I do hope that as more people find out about McCain's open border roots that they won't buy the dye job that he's given himself and the instant immigration makeover that he's trying to sell to conservatives and Republicans.

GLENN: Okay, I want you to lay it -- two pieces of audio, one from John McCain being asked about it and then another piece of audio from the gentleman that is now working with him. So you tell me the best time to play it while you explain what he's doing right now behind everybody's back.

MALKIN: Sure. Well, last month I received a tip from a concerned reader and she had listened to John McCain speak to the Hispanic Republicans in Nevada at a conference and apparently at this conference McCain was trying to tout his connection to a man named Dr. Juan Hernandez who has been named the national director of Hispanic outreach for the McCain 2008 campaign. This reader of mine was appalled when she learned of this hire and it had exactly the opposite effect that apparently McCain wanted it to have. This was supposed to be reassuring to Hispanic Republicans that this guy had been hired as outreach.

My colleague at hotair.com, Bryan Preston, confirmed this staff hire and, in fact, on John McCain's daughter's campaign website, there's a lovely, cozy picture of Juan Hernandez pivoting with Meghan McCain and Mark MacKinnon who is the campaign guru for John McCain. Well, who is this guy? I'm quite familiar with him. I've debated him several years on the cable TV circuit because he's one of the most ubiquitous ethnocentric open borders zealots on the scene.

GLENN: I have never -- you know what, Michelle, he's been on my show quite a few times. In fact, I've banned him from the show. I'm just not going to give the guy any more airtime.

MALKIN: Good. He is an expert at filibustering and he is an expert at crooked talk. He talks a smooth game about how, of course, he supports our immigration laws but at the same time he had served as a Mexican cabinet official under Vicente Fox where he worked diligently to do nothing but undermine sovereignty and our laws. Yeah, it would be a great time to go ahead and play one of those audio clips because --

GLENN: Let's play, Stu, let's first play the John McCain and then we'll play the second clip of Juan Hernandez.

STU: Right, this is the answer because someone actually asked about Juan Hernandez.

GLENN: Here it is, here's John McCain.

VOICE: I wonder if you agree with those policies. If so, explain it to me. And if not, why is he on your staff.

McCAIN: He's on my staff because he supports my policies and my proposals and my legislative proposal to secure the borders first, that no one will receive Social Security benefits who is in this country illegally. I don't know what his previous positions are, other previous positions are but he supports mine. I have nothing to do with his. And he has volunteered to help me with outreach to our Hispanic citizenry as that is his reach as I outreach to every citizen in America. I've made very clear my position on immigration, made very clear on my position on Social Security and, of course, I am grateful that we have so many people who came from Ireland to the United States of America and anybody else who can come here legally under the right system and that's the only system that I would ever support and I have no idea but I will check into the information you've given me. But I want to promise you I will secure our borders. I will not allow anyone to come here illegally. I will not allow anyone to receive Social Security or any other benefit because they have come here illegally and broken our laws.

GLENN: Okay. That's John McCain. Now, it's so disingenuous to say he doesn't know who this man is or his policies. This is a guy who used to work for Vicente Fox. He is the most open border guy you could possibly imagine. Here's just one clip of Juan Hernandez, and we've got tons of them and we'll be playing them over the next few days. Here's just one clip of Juan Hernandez on TV.

HERNANDEZ: I don't think that we need to build walls to control immigration. We are the 21st century now and we're a country that has always broken down walls. Once again with regard to securing the borders, we need to work with Mexico. We're never going to have a secure border. We're not going to put a wall up for these hundreds and hundreds thousands of miles. We have to work with our neighbors. We need to think now for the future. Canada, the United States and Mexico as a block.

GLENN: Canada, Mexico and America as a block. That's who this guy is. Michelle?

MALKIN: A block, not a region. He said it many times. He also, when he worked for this Mexican bureaucracy called the presidential office for Mexican abroad, what he did was he spent his time traveling all across our country lobbying local, state and federal officials for driver's license for illegal aliens. He defended his operators who were carrying illegal aliens to the country and who promoted extending banking privileges here in the United States to illegal aliens, lobbied to get lower rates for them so that they could send home billions of dollars in remittances back to their country. The guy does not believe in borders. He is a senior fellow at something called the Reform Institute which is a think tank that John McCain founded and it has come under scrutiny by the mainstream media because it underscores John McCain's hypocrisy not just on open borders but also on campaign finance because he's used his supposedly nonpartisan, nonprofit thinking to solicit donations from big donors who he then goes and crusades for while he's sitting on Senate committees. At this reform institute which is in part funded with George Soros money, Juan Hernandez was in charge of leading the lobbying campaign for John McCain's amnesty effort last year. And this reform institute also sponsored an art contest for students where they spent their time demonizing the border. And you can go and look. I linked this on my website, to all of the art that compares the walls our borders and our border fences to the Berlin wall which keeps people in instead of walling people out to prevent invasion, to prevent undermining our sovereignty, to prevent encroaching of our laws. And for McCain to have the gall to stand there and tell that voter in Florida who, by the way, learned about this Juan Hernandez thing by looking at our research on the Internet, for him to say that he supports securing the border first when he's got a guy outreaching to illegal aliens to persuade them to make John McCain President? It's more than nauseating. I have an ulcer.

GLENN: Michelle, I mean, I don't think -- I just don't think I have ever seen, well, at least on the GOP side I don't think I have seen anything more insidious than this kind of stuff. I mean, this is Bill Clinton insidiousness. This is somebody who is taking and wrapping themselves around an issue and trying to convince the American people that he's doing one thing and he is doing exactly the opposite behind our back.

If John McCain would get into office and this stuff would happen, I really honestly think, Michelle, and talk me down from this tree, I think John McCain is more dangerous even than Hillary Clinton because at least Hillary Clinton has Bill Clinton to make her triangulate eventually. There will be no stopping between John McCain and the Progressives of going down a road that is massive internationalists. Right or wrong?

MALKIN: I'm with you on much of that. I think it's fascinating to --

GLENN: But hang on, Michelle. My point is if you have Hillary Clinton try to pull off what John McCain is going to try to pull off, I mean, and I don't believe he doesn't know this guy's policies. This guy is a leader. If he tried to pull this off and you have a Progressive Democratic congress, there's no one to stop it because there's enough John McCain Republicans in congress that it would sweep through. They're going to sweep through all kinds of treaties, all kinds of internationalism and there would be no stopping it. I mean, you've got -- how did we get welfare reform? We got it with a Democratic President and a Republican congress. They swept it through. You want to have gigantic international global warming treaties or gigantic treaties that are signed for setting up a block of Mex-Ameri-Canada, you put John McCain in office.

MALKIN: Yeah, I understand your point about triangulation and I'm very down. I'm very depressed about the rise of John McCain. But I don't completely believe that we wouldn't be able to stop it. Look, we had a globalist open borders Republican President try to push amnesty through with the Progressive left, the open borders left. His name was George W. Bush and he did not get his way and that's thanks in large part to the conservatives and talk radio and in the grassroots who John McCain has the same hostility to. The point is we don't want to repeat history here. I don't want another George W. Bush open borders type in the White House. And, you know, I'm galled by all of the Republican establishments who think we should shut up about it. Yes, everybody should know about Juan Hernandez. Everybody should know about Jerry Perenchio who is the billionaire founder of Univision who is a national campaign co-chair of John McCain. People should know about it.

GLENN: What is his -- besides him being the head of Univision, what is, you know, what's so devious about him?

MALKIN: He's also -- I mean, he's Juan Hernandez with a billion dollars. Let's put it that way. He's led the campaign to fight an English emergent initiative which was hugely popular and won overwhelmingly in California with the 227 that abolished so-called bilingual education which is keeping students hostage and basically forcing them to learn a foreign language instead of English and it was included popularly and overwhelmingly especially by Hispanic parents, law-abiding Hispanic parents who were appalled at the public schools with teaching their kids Spanish instead of English. Well, Perenchio, who is the national co-chair for McCain, poured millions of dollars not only directly into the opposition campaign but he put hourly public service announcements on Univision claiming that this was just -- it was not about helping Hispanic families, he was about helping his bottom line an keeping people from watching Univision instead of putting it into American culture. He's also given tons of money to Planned Parenthood and the National Resources Defense Council and you can see these are birds of a feather, Juan Hernandez, Jerry Perenchio, John McCain who, you know, isn't just a guy, the open borders type but also happens to be one of these stop global warming fear mongers. So it all says, and people should know the company that he keeps and the outreach that he is doing now to Reagan is, you know, completely cynical move to try and get into the office and nobody should buy it. This is the New York Times' favorite Republican.

GLENN: So Michelle, we were doing the math today on the election. How do you reverse this?

MALKIN: Well, I said last night that it is a Mt. Everest battle for Mitt Romney and, of course, Mitt Romney has this problem but one problem he doesn't have is he doesn't have a record of crushing his shoe heel into the face of the conservatives. I would rather have someone who has, you know, had an epiphany and is now coming to court conservative votes because he wants to represent them than to somebody who even, as he now claims that he's the conservative frontrunner, continues to insult and spit in their faces.

GLENN: Michelle Malkin, I've got 30 seconds. If it's John McCain, Hillary Clinton, do you pull the lever for John McCain?

MALKIN: Not at this moment I don't. I'm running a poll right now on my site and you can see that there are a majority of my own readers who are going to sit home. And I think it's a big warning to the conservative movement out there. We still have time to fix this.

GLENN: Michelle Malkin, thank you very much, appreciate it.