Three Reasons Conservatives Are Excited About Bush 41's Endorsement Of McCain

Three Reasons Conservatives Are Excited About Bush 41's Endorsement Of McCain

      Read My Lips!                                                                           

 

It was interesting listening to the reporting today of George H.W. Bush endorsing John McCain.  Many talking about how this should help win over the conservative members of the party that have been objecting to McCain.  Of course the many making such statements would have liberal leanings if the truth was known.  Since he was Vice-President under President Reagan for eight years, then the endorsement would surely win them over.

With that reasoning the conservatives must really be dumb.  Or is it the liberal pundits?  Let's examine why like John McCain, George H.W. Bush also had problems with the conservative members of the republican party.

So why would the conservative members of the Republican Party be so excited about Bush 41 endorsing McCain?  Let us visit three reasons.

"Voodoo Economics"    Some of us haven't forgotten that BEFORE Ronald Reagan gave George Bush life again  and picked him to be the Vice President that they had a very combative battle for the Republican nomination.

"New World Order"  As much as some, maybe many would like for you to think
 that there is nothing to the talk of a New World Order.  There is something to it.  Do some research, if not for yourself, if not for your country, then for the children.  If you don't believe in the New World Order, then don't be lazy, do some research.  It is real and it is out there for you to find.  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_CWBTL33MpA 
also this one  
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pVmL2RyYe4&feature=related

Listen to this, the words that are said.  Do some research and the words will jump out at you.

"Read My Lips"  Who can forget that? " Read My Lips, No New Taxes."  Until he teamed with the democrats.  Wow, could that also be something that could happen with John McCain??   Watch the video and hear what he said, then compare it to what he did. 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP9_kkzfN-w  
also listen to this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E5DZBFbMdjI&feature=RecentlyWatched&page=1&t=t&f=b


McCain on ABC:

  • STEPHANOPOULOS: So on taxes, are you a “read my lips” candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?
  • MCCAIN: No new taxes I do not — in fact, I could see an argument if our economy continues to deteriorate for lower interest rates, lower tax rates and certainly decreasing corporate tax rates, which are the second-highest in the world, giving people the ability to write off depreciation in a year, elimination of the AMT. There’s a lot of things that I would think we should to relieve that burden, including, obviously, as we all know, simplification of the tax code.
  • STEPHANOPOULOS: But under no circumstances would you increase taxes?
  • MCCAIN: No.
  • STEPHANOPOULOS: So on taxes, are you a “read my lips” candidate, no new taxes, no matter what?
  • MCCAIN: No new taxes I do not — in fact, I could see an argument if our economy continues to deteriorate for lower interest rates, lower tax rates and certainly decreasing corporate tax rates, which are the second-highest in the world, giving people the ability to write off depreciation in a year, elimination of the AMT. There’s a lot of things that I would think we should to relieve that burden, including, obviously, as we all know, simplification of the tax code.
  • STEPHANOPOULOS: But under no circumstances would you increase taxes?
  • MCCAIN: No.

http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/02/17/mccain-makes-no-new-taxes-pledge/

Lets look at them both.  What a difference a day makes as the old saying goes.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iu92O1PL6UY

As Patrick Henry said:"I have but one lamp by which my feet are guided, and that is the lamp of experience. I know of no way of judging the future but by the past." 

Read the excerpted part from an essay below or read the whole essay if you don't understand by now why conservatives HAD problems with George H. W. Bush also.  With that being understood, why would his endorsement of someone excite them?


 "The impact of the pledge was considerable, and many believe it helped Bush win the 1988 United States presidential election. Once president, however, Bush agreed to raise several taxes as part of a 1990 budget agreement. This has been attributed to a declining economy, ballooning budget deficits, and the need to compromise with the Democrat-controlled Congress. This reversal caused great controversy, especially in the more conservative wing of the Republican Party. "

Excerpted from an essay by
Michael R. Beschloss:

 

At the Republican Convention in Detroit, Ronald Reagan worried about the depth of Bush's convictions. At first he resisted advice to choose for Vice President the man who had gotten the second most votes in the primaries. He privately disparaged Bush's ability to "stand up to the pressure of being President": "I'm concerned about turning the country over to him." But after former President Ford withdrew his name from consideration, Reagan swallowed his doubts, made the call, and asked Bush whether he could support the party platform, the most conservative in forty years.

This was no small question. During the primaries, Bush had derided Reagan's hallmark pledge to cut taxes while hugely increasing the defense budget as "voodoo economics." He had supported abortion rights. But, willing to pay the price for political rebirth, Bush immediately told Reagan that he could support the platform "wholeheartedly." .....

Bush's eight years as Reagan's number two were made miserable by his ostentatious effort to convince what he privately called the "extra-chromosome" conservatives that he was not some kind of closet one-world liberal. Bush's vice-presidential predecessor, Walter Mondale, had warned him after the 1980 election that "a President does not want and the public does not respect a Vice President who does nothing but deliver fulsome praise of a President." ....

But Bush now felt his only chance for President in 1988 lay in winning over Reagan and his increasingly dominant wing of the party. On the simple level of private character, he showed admirable loyalty. More than any other vice president of the post-war era, Bush refused to allow sunlight between himself and his President. He eschewed background interviews with reporters designed to make himself look good at the boss's expense and used all public opportunities to demonstrate himself as a Reaganite, at one moment incautiously saying, "I'm for Mr. Reagan, blindly!" He defended himself by saying that in his family, loyalty was "not considered a character flaw."

It was the unrelenting ardor of that loyalty, from a Vice President who had once so disagreed with the Reaganites, that critics considered a character flaw. .......

During the (1988) campaign, Bush had encouraged the impression that his first years in office might be tantamount to Reagan's third term, with many Reagan appointees held over and the former President perhaps flown in from California from time to time as a kind of political godfather. That did not happen. Few high officials survived from the era of Reagan into that of Bush. During the Bush presidency, the forty-first President, who still held the hearts of most Republicans and to whom Bush owed his office, appeared in the White House exactly twice. Many conservatives suspected that by thumbing his nose at Reaganism, the new President, intoxicated by victory, was paying them back for all the years of humiliations while courting the right.

If they were correct, Bush was showing dangerous hubris and self-indulgence. The Republican Party, if anything, was growing more conservative than ever. If Bush did not wish to expend the effort to try moving his party to the center, as Eisenhower had attempted and failed to do, it would have been more sensible for the President to show that he understood the balance of forces within his party. But, buoyed by his high approval ratings, Bush gave signs of allowing himself to believe that he was unsinkable. His "what-me-worry?" attitude culminated in July 1990, when he reneged on his supreme campaign promise not to raise taxes. This told conservatives once and for all that Bush was not really one of them. .....

 del.icio.us  Stumbleupon  Technorati  Digg 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this entry.
Leave a comment

Submitted comments will be subject to moderation before being displayed.

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.