Sean Hannity Imploding!

What Makes Rush Right?

    

After Super Tuesday it was interesting to listen to Talk Radio on Crazy Wednesday.  First let us ask the question about Rush Limbaugh.  He stated on his radio show today that there is NO Way Huckabee is going to win the nomination.  I have a simple question for all of the Czar's of Talk Radio.  The ones championing that Mike Huckabee get out of the race so Mitt Romney can take John McCain out.

The question is this:  You want a person who CAN'T win the nomination get out of the race so that a person that CAN'T beat this loser in a lot of states can take Juan McCain out.  If Romney can't beat Huckabee, what makes him the one to beat McCain?  Couldn't the same thing be said about Romney?  That he should get out of the race so that Huckabee can take out McCain?  If you can't say that then why?  Besides of the fact that Romney has more money?

Speaking of money.  It is clear Romney has a lot more money they Huckabee to try and get his message out.  Romney has clearly used this advantage.  The only problem is that it doesn't translate into votes.  So WHY should it be Huckabee instead of Romney who should get out?

Sir Sean Hannity imploded on his national radio program today.  How bad was it?

One statement Hannity said was Huckabee was mad at him because he endorsed Romney.  Sir Sean is good at taking a few words and twist them to go with the point he is attempting to make.  I would  think IF Huckabee is upset with Sir Sean Hannity, it wouldn't be because he endorsed Romney, BUT because Hannity and others are working at undermining Huckabee's campaign to try and get him out of the race.

Here is where Hannity went completely overboard or off the planet.  Hannity talks about Ron Paul being out there, Hannity really had to reach to come up with this:

If Huckabee would have dropped out after the Florida Primary (after all he did place 4th) and then if Rudy Giuliani had stayed in, how different would have Super Tuesday looked.  Then Hannity went into which states Romney MIGHT have won and Giuliani MIGHT have won then they could have stopped McCain.

WOW, as I write this Hannity just brought this up again on his TV show, not in so much detail but about Florida and if Huckabee had gotten out and Giuliani stayed in.  Okay let us look at it another way since Hannity wants to deal with the issue if frogs had wings.

After New Hampshire if Giuliani got out (he place 4th there) or if Fred Thompson got out (he placed 6th there) then Mike Huckabee would have won South Carolina.  Then if that had happened who would have won Florida?  Why am I asking such a question?  I don't know?  It doesn't do any good, it doesn't change anything.  It is kind of like if I had played those lottery numbers last night I would have won it.

So if it doesn't make any sense or do any good for me to ask such a question then what does it make sense for Sean Hannity to ask such a question?  Here is an example of Sean Hannity talking about what would happen if Frogs had wings.